Juhel v. Rhinelander
Juhel v. Rhinelander
2 Johns. Cas. 120
Opinion of the Court
dissenting) said, that they considered the decision, in the case of Seton, Maitland & Co. v. Low, as conclusive, and that the plaintiff' was entitled to judgment accordingly. r
Judgment for the plaintiff.(
(b) Affirmed in the court of errors, in 1802, infra, 487.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.