New York Supreme Court, 1801

Haskins v. Sebor

Haskins v. Sebor
New York Supreme Court · Decided January 15, 1801
2 Johns. Cas. 217

Counsel

Pendleton, for the defendant,, jB. Livingston, contra.

Haskins v. Sebor

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

As the defendant did not apply at the July term, hut has suffered two terms to elapse, since the defendant’s default, he must be considered as having waived the default, and the plaintiff is *freed from his stipulation. This being, then, as it were, the first application, the plaintiff is entitled to a new stipulation; and the motion must be denied.

Rule refused.(a)

(a) See Grah. Prae. 2d ed. 616-G18, 619.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.