New York Supreme Court, 1801

Seaman v. Haskins

New York Supreme Court · Decided April 15, 1801

2 Johns. Cas. 284

Counsel

Colden, for the plaintiff,, Riker, contra.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

After the court have given judgment, and ordered it to be entered, and a term has elapsed, the party comes too late to ask for leave to withdraw his demurrer. He should have applied at the last term, before the rule for judgment was entered.

Motion denied.(a)

(a) See Andrews v. Beecher, supra, vol. 1, p. 411. Hildreth v. Harvey, infra, vol. 3, p. 301. Furman v. Haskins, 2 Caines, 369. Currie v. Henry, 3 Johns. R. 140. Miller v. Heath, 7 Cowen, 101. Boltons v. Lawrence, 7 Wend. 461. Patrick v. Conrad, 3 A. K. Marsh, 612. Surlott v. Pratt, id. 174. Ralston v. Bullits, 3 Bibb, 261. Violett v. Dale, 1 id. 141. Hancock v. Vawter, Hardin, 310.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.