New York Supreme Court, 1803

Sheffield v. Watson

Sheffield v. Watson
New York Supreme Court · Decided May 15, 1803 · Radcliff
1 Cai. Cas. 22

Counsel

Woods, contra., Hopkins.

Sheffield v. Watson

Opinion of the Court

Radcliff, J.

Acting under that belief, he did not prepare himself.

Hopkins asked for a stipulation and costs.

Per Curiam.

The excuse is certainly not sufficient to exonerate from costs. If admitted in one case, it must be in all; and, however the good faith of the plaintiff’s com duct, and our belief of it, may deny the judgment moved for, to refuse costs would do away the effect of the rule. The plaintiff must stipulate.(a)

On stipulation and costs, motion denied.

See Russell v. Ball, post, 252.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.