New York Supreme Court, 1803

Hallet v. Cotton

Hallet v. Cotton
New York Supreme Court · Decided April 15, 1803
1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 150

Counsel

Hawes now moved,, Bogert said,

Hallet v. Cotton

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The practice of the mayor’s court, in obliging the amount of the verdict to be brought into court on a motion for a new trial, has never been *153adopted here. The insolvency bf the bail,* is certainly hot a sufficient ground to induce us to make such an order; and a copy of the affirmation, respecting the defendant’s circumstances* has never been served on him ; of that, therefore, we can take no notice. But, let it be understood, we do not mean to say, that had it been otherwise, we would have , , . granted the motion.

Rule refused.

See Gillespie ads. Pfister and M'Comb,ante, p. 120.

Card ads-Fitzroy and on. ante, p. 69. See also Grove ads. that supplementary affibut those in answer, can"eived,6

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.