New York Supreme Court, 1803

Sheffield v. Watson

Sheffield v. Watson
New York Supreme Court · Decided April 15, 1803 · Radcliff
1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 157

Counsel

Woods, contra., Hopkins.

Sheffield v. Watson

Opinion of the Court

Radcliff, J.

Acting under that belief, he did not prepare himself.

Hopkins hoped the plaintiff would be ordered to stipulate and pay costs.

Per Curiam.

The excuse is certainly not sufficient to exonerate from costs. If admitted in one case, it niust be in all; and however the good faith of the *158plaintiff’s conduct, and our belief of it, may deny the judgment moved for, to refuse costs would do away the effect of the rule. The plaintiff must stipulate.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.