New York Supreme Court, 1803

Remsen v. Isaacs

New York Supreme Court · Decided May 15, 1803

1 Cai. Cas. 22b

Counsel

Woods, contra.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The rule is according to the decision cited. The application must be for irregularity only to bring it on *39as a non-enumerated motion. If merits are united, it becomes enumerated.(a)

Motion denied.

S. P. Foden and Slater v. Sharp, & Johns. Rep. 183. .

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.