People v. James
Opinion of the Court
The prisoner James had been convicted of forgery and committed to the state prison. He had been pardoned by the executive, upon condition of leaving the United State:* within forty days. Being found in the city of Hew York after the expiration of the time limited for his departure from this country, he was taken up and committed to the county prison. The District Attorney obtained a rule against him, ordering him to show cause
The game practice in The King v. Patrick Madam, 1 Leach’s Cas. 263.
See vol. 1, p. 12, M'Neil’s case, the necessity of producing the reoord of a former conviction.
Otherwise a venire would have been ordered instantly to try the fact, Ratdiffe's Case, Poster’s Crown Law, 41.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.