New York Supreme Court, 1805

Moore v. Bacon

Moore v. Bacon
New York Supreme Court · Decided May 15, 1805
3 Cai. Cas. 83; 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 433

Counsel

P. W. Radcliff., Caines., contra,, jP. W. Radclff, in reply.

Moore v. Bacon

Opinion of the Court

Per curiam.

The observation of the defendant’s counsel takes this case out of the general rule. The order to stay proceedings was applied for, and evinces, that the joinder was amere matter ■of precaution, not a reliance on, or affirmance of, the correctness of the proceedings. The amendment therefore must be allowed, on payment of the costs'’of the assignment of errors, and those of resisting this application.^

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.