New York Supreme Court, 1805

Napier v. Whipple

Napier v. Whipple
New York Supreme Court · Decided May 15, 1805
3 Cai. Cas. 88
Napier v. Whipple

Opinion of the Court

THE plaintiffs’ original attorney had left this state before the return of the writ; the one now employed found, on search, a' rule entered, to declare or be nonprossed. In consequence of which he served a declaration, received a plea of the general issue, went to trial, and obtained a verdict.

Emott, on an affidavit containing the above statement, and ... . „ that, from having received no instructions or papers from the first attorney, he could not obtain the bail bond given in this suit, • which was taken by one of the plaintiffs, who was specially deputis-ed, to make the arrest, moved to file common bail nunc pro tunc, which was, after slight Opposition,

Ordered accordingly,

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.