New York Supreme Court, 1805

Brooks v. Hunt

Brooks v. Hunt
New York Supreme Court · Decided May 15, 1805 · Thompson
3 Cai. Cas. 94; 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 444

Counsel

Paris, contra,, Sanford, in reply.

Brooks v. Hunt

Opinion of the Court

Per curiam.

The defendant had a right to move, and therefore, t^10US^ we ^eny bis motion, it must be on payment of costs ; but, from the circumstances of the case, the plaintiff is excuse» from stipulating.

*95NEW-YORK, May, 1805. Thompson, J.

I do not think this according to practice. The cause was long enough at issue to allow of a notice, and he ought therefore to stipulate.

*⅞* It was said by the bench, that in all cases the period within which costs are to be paid, is twenty days.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.