Bruen v. Adams
Bruen v. Adams
3 Cai. Cas. 97; 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 448
Opinion of the Court
The practice, I adopted was, that if the defendant’s counsel said there was a defence, I did not allow it to be taken.
Per curiam.
The affidavit is defective, in not saying there is a defence “ as advised by counsel.” In this case there has been a frivolous demurrer, and that is a very suspicious circumstance. ^ie defendants, therefore, take nothing by their motion.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.