New York Supreme Court, 1805

Blasdell v. Hewit

Blasdell v. Hewit
New York Supreme Court · Decided August 15, 1805 · Kent, Livingston, Spenceh, Thompson
3 Cai. Cas. 137

Counsel

Weston, for the plaintiff in error,, Shephard., contra.

Blasdell v. Hewit

Opinion of the Court

Kent, C. J.

The act* gives the moiety of the penalty to the overseers of the town in which the offence is committed ; this alone is fatal.

16 Sec. 1 Rev. Laws 490.

Concurring Opinion

Spenceh, J.

The declaration wants time and place ; nor does it negative the qualifications of the proviso. For all of these reasons it is, therefore, bad.

Livingston, J.

It ought to have been shewn what liquors were sold, and perhaps to have negatived the others.

THOMPSON J.

The declaration is clearly defective on the last ground taken by Mr, Justice Spencer,

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.