New York Supreme Court, 1805

M'Vickar v. Woolcot

M'Vickar v. Woolcot
New York Supreme Court · Decided August 15, 1805
1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 501
M'Vickar v. Woolcot

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Were we to permit the amendment, the opposite party might lose the benefit of cross-examining ; for the interrogatories exhibited to one, might not be proper to administer to another, from *502whom it might be wished to extract new evidence. ° The first part of the motion must, therefore, be denied ; but you may take a new commission at your peril, without, however, any stay of proceedings on the partrof the plaintiff.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.