New York Supreme Court, 1806

Hardenbergh v. Thompson

Hardenbergh v. Thompson
New York Supreme Court · Decided February 15, 1806
1 Johns. 61

Counsel

Ehnendorf and Suydam,, for the plaintiff in error,

Hardenbergh v. Thompson

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The rule to join in error ought to have been personally served on the defendant. It was so decided, in October term 18.01, in error, on certiorari, .where a motion for judgment of reversal on default, for not joining in error, though not opposed, was denied, it appear- . ing, that no attorney had been employed by the defendant in error, and that the notice had been put up in the clerk’s office.

Rule granted.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.