New York Supreme Court, 1806

Blasdale v. Babcock

Blasdale v. Babcock
New York Supreme Court · Decided August 15, 1806
1 Johns. 517

Counsel

Van Vechten and Foot for the defendant,, Shepherd, contra.

Blasdale v. Babcock

Cases that cite this one

18 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The record was proper evidence, for without it, the plaintiff could not have shown a legal eviction. The first notice given to the defendant of the other suit brought against the plaintiff for the horse, was sufficient; and he was bound to know all the subsequent proceedings, without a special notice, of the time every subsequent court was to be held. There was no misdirection by the judge ; and we are of opinion that the plaintiff is entitled to a judgment.

Judgment for the plaintiff.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.