New York Supreme Court, 1806

Dando v. Doll

Dando v. Doll
New York Supreme Court · Decided November 15, 1806
2 Johns. 88

Counsel

J. .S Smith, for the plaintiff., Williams, for the defendant.

Dando v. Doll

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The judgment is clearly regular and in form against both defendants. There is no plea or suggestion of any defence by Doll, who has merely pleaded mil tiel record. On this judgment and this plea we have no alternative; but must say that the plaintiff is entitled to judgment. We give no opinion what it would be proper to decide, on any other plea, or statement of Acts submitted to the court.

Judgment for the plaintiff.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.