New York Supreme Court, 1807

Burlingham v. Deyer

Burlingham v. Deyer
New York Supreme Court · Decided February 15, 1807
2 Johns. 189

Counsel

KirMand, for the plaintiff in error,, Simonds, contra.

Burlingham v. Deyer

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The witness was a mere agent or servant, and must be considered as a competent witness, from necessity. A justice cannot act from his own previous knowledge of facts; but they must be proved before him. He must decide upon evidence produced in court. The justice ought not to have refused the release tendered by the defendant to the witness. The judgment below must be reversed.

Judgment reversed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.