New York Supreme Court, 1807

Kellogg v. Mauncy

Kellogg v. Mauncy
New York Supreme Court · Decided August 15, 1807
2 Johns. 378

Counsel

Ingalls,for the plaintiffin error., Henry, contra.

Kellogg v. Mauncy

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The only question is, whether the declaration of the plaintiff below was fully proved. The certificate of the former judgment, which was produced, and iiot objected to, tvas prima facie evidence, at least, of the existence of the judgment; and as this evidence was not Contradicted or questioned by the' defendant below, it must be considered as sufficient to support the judgment.-

Judgment affirmed;

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.