New York Supreme Court, 1808

Todd v. Crookshanks

Todd v. Crookshanks
New York Supreme Court · Decided August 15, 1808
3 Johns. 432

Counsel

Crary, for the plaintiff in error., Skinner, contra.

Todd v. Crookshanks

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

There was no foundation for the action below. After the note was paid, and a receipt in full given, by one of the payees, it was completely discharged, so as to be of no value. The note did not belong to the plaintiff, and it might be useful to Todd, the other payee, who was a co-executor, to show that he had not received the money. An action of trover will lie for a note in the hands of a third person ; but such an action as this was never before brought.

Judgment reversed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.