Dickenson v. Commercial Insurance
Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff ought to have disclosed the fact that such general intelligence was in the city: here, therefore, has been a material concealment, and the contract consequently is void.
Verdict for the plaintiff, for a return of premium,
Bogardus and Hopkins, for the plaintiff.
Wells, for defendants.
I) Even doubtful rumors, respecting the safety of a ship, which is meant to be insured lost, or not lost, how little credit soever the owner himself may give them, ought to be faithfully disclosed; and the withholding such information will avoid the contract. 1 Marshal, 411. Every fact and circumstance, which can possibly influence the mind of any prudent and intelligent insurer,
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.