New York Supreme Court, 1810

Root v. Sherwood

Root v. Sherwood
New York Supreme Court · Decided May 15, 1810
6 Johns. 68

Counsel

Foot, for the defendant., Haggles and E. Williams, contra.

Root v. Sherwood

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The jury, when they came to the bar to deliver in their verdict, had a right to dissent from the verdict to which they had previously agreed. There js no verdict of any force but a public verdict, given openly in court; until it was received and recorded it was no verdict, and the jury had a right to alter it as they may a private verdict. The previous agreement, that the jury might seal up their verdict, did not take away from the parties, the right to a public verdict, duly delivered. There being then no legal verdict in this case, a new trial must be awarded with costs to abide the event of the suit.

New trial granted. -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.