New York Supreme Court, 1810

Jackson ex dem. Mapes v. Frost

Jackson ex dem. Mapes v. Frost
New York Supreme Court · Decided May 15, 1810
6 Johns. 135

Counsel

P. W. Radcliff and St foñes,, Wells and C. I. Bogert,

Jackson ex dem. Mapes v. Frost

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The interest of Barton having been released before he was offered as a witness, his being implicated in the fraud, went only to his credit, and not to his competency. He was a competent witness to disprove as well as to prove the fraud. On this ground, we think a new trial ought to be granted, with costs to abide the event of the suit.

New trial granted.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.