New York Supreme Court, 1810

Hogeboom v. Genet

Hogeboom v. Genet
New York Supreme Court · Decided August 15, 1810
6 Johns. 325

Counsel

J. Russell, contra.

Hogeboom v. Genet

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

An interlocutory, or final judgment, cannot be entered in vacation, unless on a cognovit actionem.

Kent, Ch. J. said he had always supposed, that an . interlocutory judgment might be entered at any time, after four days in term had intervened, either in vacation or term time. But since it seemed to be the general opinion, that the practice was different, he acquiesced in granting the motion.

Motion granted.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.