New York Supreme Court, 1811

Dizen v. Bates

Dizen v. Bates
New York Supreme Court · Decided February 15, 1811
7 Johns. 537

Counsel

Rodman, contra.

Dizen v. Bates

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The motion must be denied. The proceedings on the part of the defendant have been regular. The rule is explicit, that the defendant, having duly appeared, may, at any time thereafter, take a rule against the plaintiff to declare before the end of the term next following, after service of the notice of the rule. Where the service of the notice is at any time before the term, the plaintiff is in default, if he does not declare before the end of the term.

Motion denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.