New York Supreme Court, 1812

Carpenter v. Alexander

Carpenter v. Alexander
New York Supreme Court · Decided October 15, 1812
9 Johns. 291

Counsel

H. Bleecker, in support of the demurrer, contended, that the breach was not assigned with sufficient certainty,, E. Williams, contra.

Carpenter v. Alexander

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The breach is not well assigned, for it does not appear, with sufficient certainty, which of the two sums of 125 -1 T, , . . m, , . „ dollars has not been paid. The court can, perhaps, infer from the whole record, that the breach was intended to apply to the non-payment of the first sum mentioned in the condition of the bond; but the party ought not to leave such a fact to inference and deduction, but allege it with precision and certainty; and if he does not, he ought to be punished in costs, for slovenly and careless pleading. There must be judgment for the defendant, with leave, however, to the plaintiff to amend his declaration, on the usual terms.

Judgment for the defendant.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.