New York Supreme Court, 1812

Smith v. Birdsall

Smith v. Birdsall
New York Supreme Court · Decided October 15, 1812
9 Johns. 328
Smith v. Birdsall

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The above charges are reasonable and just, and no more than an indemnity. The defendant appears' to have been in contempt, and, consequently, liable to the costs and expenses of *329the attachment. The habeas corpus act allows 12 1-2 cetns a mile, for bringing up a person, and the charges, also, for taking him back, if remanded~ Where the Jaw is silent as to charges for particular services, the court, if they allow any thing, must allow what is reasonable.

, Judgment for the plaintiff.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.