New York Supreme Court, 1814

Hallett v. Slidell

Hallett v. Slidell
New York Supreme Court · Decided January 15, 1814
11 Johns. 56

Counsel

Maynard and Foot, for the plaintiffs in error., Slosson, contra.

Hallett v. Slidell

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

According to Long v. Jackson, (2 Wils. 8.) the plaintiffs were authorized to introduce into their replication matter in explanation of, or to fortify, their declaration, without incurring the charge of a departure; and as they introduced new matter, to wit, the course and practice of the court as to appearance, the conclusion with a verification was proper, and the judgment below must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed'.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.