New York Supreme Court, 1814

Dole v. Young

Dole v. Young
New York Supreme Court · Decided May 15, 1814
11 Johns. 90

Counsel

Foot contened that the plaintiff,, Buel, contra,, Foot, in reply,

Dole v. Young

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We have not adopted the rule of the English court of K. B. that the plaintiff is out of court if he does' not *91declare in one year after the defendant's appearance. But, there being no attorney employed in this case, the copy of the declaration and notice of the rule to plead, ought to have been served oii the defendant personally, or by leaving them at his usua place of abode. The proceedings must, therefore, be set aside

Rule granted, (a)

See S. P. Cheetham v. Lewis, (5 Caines' Rep. 256.)

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.