Shuter v. Page

Courts have allowed, pleas in, many instances, apparently as inconsistent as thosedn the present case. In Stibbard v. Glover, (Barnes, 364.) non cepit, property in a stranger, and liberum tenementum were allowed to be pleaded together, in replevin. So, not guilty and justification may be pleaded in trespass. We se© no reason, for distinguishing the present casp, from those decided,* The motion is denied.

Motion denied.