New York Supreme Court, 1815

Oothout v. Rooth

Oothout v. Rooth
New York Supreme Court · Decided January 15, 1815
12 Johns. 151

Counsel

I. Hamilton, contra.

Oothout v. Rooth

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

, Lhe proviso is unusual m notices, but is implied in every notice of this kind. If it should happen that no interlocutory judgment should be obtained, and no notice of the fact should be given, the party who gave such notice, would be liable to costs. The words in the notice might be rejected as surplusage. We do not think it a sufficient ground for setting aside the proceedings.

Motion denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.