New York Supreme Court, 1816

Jackson ex dem. Barhydt v. Clow

Jackson ex dem. Barhydt v. Clow
New York Supreme Court · Decided January 15, 1816
13 Johns. 157

Counsel

M‘Koun, for the defendant,, J‘. V. N. Yates, contra.

Jackson ex dem. Barhydt v. Clow

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The plea of puis darrein continuance was put in in proper time; and the only question is, whether the defendant was bound to serve a copy of it at the time. Where the matter of the plea arises so as to render it necessary that the plea should be filed in term time, a copy of it must be served; but where the matter arises in vacation, so that the plea can only be offered at the circuit, in order to prevent a trial, a copy need not be served.

Motion denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.