Millon v. Salisbury
Millon v. Salisbury
13 Johns. 211
Opinion of the Court
Millón being a bailee for hire, and chargeable with no ill treatment, and having employed the horse to no other-use than that which was expressly agreed on, and paid for, he is not liable for such an injury as the plaintiff below complains’ pf-
As to all accidents naturally incident to the use of the horse, in the manner contracted for, the law imposes the risk on the bailor. Injustice has been done, and the judgment ought to he reversed.
Judgment reversed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.