New York Supreme Court, 1817

Tallmadge v. Stockholm

Tallmadge v. Stockholm
New York Supreme Court · Decided October 15, 1817
14 Johns. 342

Counsel

Bloom, for the defendants,, Swift, contra.

Tallmadge v. Stockholm

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We have, from time to time, gradually the practice, as to setting aside a default for want of a plea; we have now come to the general rule, that a default for want of a plea, though regularly entered, will be set aside, in every case, on the payment of costs, where there is an of merits, and no trial has been lost. The payment of costs is a sufficient penalty on the defendant for neglecting to plead. We grant the motion, therefore, on payment of costs.

Rule granted. (a)

Vide Davenport v. Ferris, 6 Johns. Rep. 131. Tidd's Pr. 508.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.