Blake v. Jerome
Blake v. Jerome
14 Johns. 406
Opinion of the Court
The judgment must be affirmed. The evidence as to the right of property in the mare and coltimay be somewhat questionable ; but the defendant below was, at all events, guilty of a tresspass, in sending a person on the land of the plaintiff to take them away. (6 Johns* Rep. 5.) The action was, therefore, technically supported, and where the evidence as to true ownership of the property is so nearly balanced, the judgment ought not to be disturbed.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.