New York Supreme Court, 1820

Baldwin v. Hale

Baldwin v. Hale
New York Supreme Court · Decided January 15, 1820
17 Johns. 272

Counsel

Johnson, in support of the demurrer,, II. Sedgwick, contra.

Baldwin v. Hale

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

In the case of Collins v. Lord Matthews, (5 East’s Rep. 473.) it was decided that a plea of nul tiel record, pleaded to an action of debt, on an Irish judgment, must conclude to the country ; for though since the Union such judgment is a record, yet it is only provable by an examined copy on oath, the verity of which is only triable by a jury. The Circuit Court of the United States, in relation to this court, is *218neither a superior nor an inferior court; but is to be regarded as a court of another government Their records, therefore, as to this purpose, are foreign records, and the verity of them must be tried by a jury. The original record of that court cannot be brought here to be inspected by this court; nor can the tenor of it be brought, in by a certiorari or mittimus out of chancery. (1 Chitty’s PI. 537. 1 'Field’s Pr. 691.)

*We are of opinion, therefore, that the objection taken to the conclusion of the replication is well founded, and that the defendant is entitled to judgment on the demurrer: but the plaintiffs have leave to amend.

Judgment for the defendant.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.