New York Supreme Court, 1820

Roosevelt v. Crommelin

Roosevelt v. Crommelin
New York Supreme Court · Decided August 15, 1820
18 Johns. 253

Counsel

R. Sedgwick for the defendants,, S. Jones, jun. contra., Sedgwick, in reply.

Roosevelt v. Crommelin

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The motion, in this case, is not grounded on any irregularity in the proceedings ; and we shall not, therefore, relieve, except on terms. The defendant, if he wishes to reverse the proceedings, on the facts stated, must resort to a writ of error. But, without giving, any opinion on the case as stated in the affidavits, we must deny *257the motion, unless the defendant puts in good special on a writ to be issued in a new action. bail,

Rule accordingly.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.