New York Supreme Court, 1821

Kirkham v. Fox

Kirkham v. Fox
New York Supreme Court · Decided May 15, 1821
19 Johns. 126

Counsel

Nelson, for the defendant,, Todd, contra,

Kirkham v. Fox

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

There is no contradiction in the cases cited. If the defendant was held to bail in the Court below, the plaintiff is entitled to bail, on its removal here ; and though no bail should be required, in the Court below, yet the plaintiff may insist upon special bail in this Court. The motion must be denied.

Motion denied. (a)

Vide 1 Dunlap’s Pr. 224.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.