New York Supreme Court, 1822

King v. Burr

King v. Burr
New York Supreme Court · Decided August 15, 1822
20 Johns. 274

Counsel

Oakley, contra.

King v. Burr

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We do not recognise any such privilege of attorneys or counsellors of this Court; but shall direct the venue to be changed or not, as it may be most convenient to the parties. The defendant, in this case, swears, that *275he has material witnesses residing in the city oí New-York ‘ and the plaintiff’s attorney swears, also, to witnesses on his part; but the plaintiff himself has made no affidavit. We grant the motion, on the ground of the defendant’s affidavit, as to material witnesses for him in JYew-York.

Motion granted.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.