New York Supreme Court, 1823

Anonymous

Anonymous
New York Supreme Court · Decided May 15, 1823
1 Cow. 60

Counsel

/_ Seelye, J

Anonymous

Opinion of the Court

Curia.

This is not necessary, on an application requiring the plaintiff to give security for costs, x

Seelye, said the rule, requiring security, applies only to cases of absence from the state. (Pfister & M'Comb v. Gillespie, 2 John. Cas. 109.)

Curia.

We consider this application as standing upon the same ground/ The plaintiff is equally out of the reach of execution, as if absent from the state,

Motion granted.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.