New York Supreme Court, 1823

Norton v. Rich

Norton v. Rich
New York Supreme Court · Decided January 15, 1823
20 Johns. 475

Counsel

L. Mitchell, contra,

Norton v. Rich

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

That is a remedy which the party may have pending the suit; but he is, also, entitled to an attachment, after a judgment in his favour. The motion must be granted.

Mitchell objected, that items had been taxed in the bill for costs, on making a motion to change the venue in the

CBtiSG*

Per Curiam.

Although costs are not given on a motion *476to change the venue in a cause, yet they abide the event, an(j the party may have them taxed, when final judgment is signed.

Motion granted.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.