New York Supreme Court, 1823

Allan v. Smith

Allan v. Smith
New York Supreme Court · Decided January 15, 1823
20 Johns. 477

Counsel

C. Cr. Troup, and-—, for the tenant., E. Howe, and Lee, for the demandant.

Allan v. Smith

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The affidavits, on the part of the defendant, show, not only that he has a material defence, but that *478he has been prevented from appearing on the return of the summonSj by mistake and accident. Every Court has the power to adapt its practice to the attainment of justice between the parties ; whatever may be the ancient practice on writs of right, and in actions of dower, we cannot consent, that a party shall be deprived of his right to make a defence, when he has one to make, and has been deprived of the opportunity of doing it,' by mere mistake or accident. We think the motion ought, to be granted.

Rule granted. (a)

Vide Booth's Real Actions, 23. 25. ch. 8. Saver Default. 2 Sellon's Practice, 295. 2 Saund. 43, 44. n. 1. Co. Litt. 259. 1 Johns. Rep. 329. 18 Johns. Rep. 504

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.