Jackson ex. dem. Colden v. Paul

This is not enough, to warrant.us in retaining that demise. ■ Thelessors must.have a plaitn to a subsisting .title or interest in ¡the premises. The affidavit on the part of ,the ¡gi^ntiffdoes npt show,this. Jackson v. Richmond, cited by *503the counsel for the defendant, is decisive in favor of the application.

Rule granted.