New York Supreme Court, 1824

Ex parte Kellogg

Ex parte Kellogg
New York Supreme Court · Decided October 15, 1824
3 Cow. 372

Counsel

R- -D. Noxon, moved for a mandamus commanding them to do this; but,

Ex parte Kellogg

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The statute is merely directory. True, if

the Justice does not return on or before the first day of the next term after the appeal, it is an omission of duty ; but the party is not to suffer by this. If filed at any time afterwards, he may proceed in his appeal. The statute does not require that the payment of costs should be endorsed upon the bond. If, in fact, paid, this is enough ; and the contrary is not pretended.

Motion denied,

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.