New York Supreme Court, 1825

Gleason v. Pinney

Gleason v. Pinney
New York Supreme Court · Decided October 15, 1825 · Curia, Savage
5 Cow. 152

Counsel

B. D. Noxon, for the plaintiff in error., S. Beardsley, contra,

Gleason v. Pinney

Opinion of the Court

Curia, per Savage, Ch. J.

The Court of Common Pleas adopted the true measure of damages. The defendant below acknowledged, by his several notes, the amount of the debt due in dollars and cents. The delivery of the salt was the mere mode of payment. He might have *153avoided the payment of the whole sum by this delivery; hut not having done so, he should not be discharged by paying less than the debt which he has agreed to be due. This precise question was very fully considered in Brooks v. Hubbard, cited by the counsel for the defendant in error ; and the rule acted upon in this case, hoi den to he the correct one. The same rule was recognized by this Court, in Smith v. Smith, (2 John. Rep. 235, 243.) The judgment must he affirmed.

Judgment affirmed,

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.