New York Supreme Court, 1826

Dorland v. Dorland

Dorland v. Dorland
New York Supreme Court · Decided May 15, 1826
5 Cow. 417

Counsel

J. A. Dunlap now moved to set aside as irregular., W. Crafts, contra, cited 14 John. 330 ; 2 Cowen, 495.

Dorland v. Dorland

Opinion of the Court

Curia.

The second execution was irregular. The farthest we have gone, before the first execution returned, is, to allow another in a county different from the one to which the first issued. The consent of Borland cannot affect the rights of Willets. The second fi. fa. and all subsequent proceedings upon it, must be set aside with costs, on the defendant, Willets, stipulating to bring no action for the levy under it.

Rule accordingly.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.