New York Supreme Court, 1826

Jackson ex dem. Demont v. Sackett

Jackson ex dem. Demont v. Sackett
New York Supreme Court · Decided August 15, 1826
6 Cow. 38

Counsel

T. Mumford , L. F. Stevens opposed the motion.

Jackson ex dem. Demont v. Sackett

Opinion of the Court

Curia.

We think otherwise. You must shew the defendants to be in contempt. For this purpose you are required to exhibit the original rule. It is still more important that the power should be shown. In most cases, parties have knowledge of the rule taken against them ; or may, at least, obtain knowledge of it by searching the minutes of court. The power is a private document, the knowledge of which lies between the attorney and his agent. The uniform practice has been to require its exhibition. The motion must be denied.

Motion denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.