New York Supreme Court, 1827

Witherwax v. Averill

Witherwax v. Averill
New York Supreme Court · Decided February 15, 1827
6 Cow. 589

Counsel

J. L. Wendell, for the plaintiff,, E. CoiOen, contra.

Witherwax v. Averill

Opinion of the Court

Curia.

The ground upon which we compel a defendant to elect between a plea of nul tiel record, and other pleas, is, that their mode of trial is different; one being by the record, the others by jury. No such consequence follows here from retaining both pleas. The existence of a justice’s judgment is not determinable at bar, by the record. It ranks as a specialty. (16 John. 233.) And the plea of nul tiel record, if it be good and capable of trial, in this case, must be tried by a jury.

Motion denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.