New York Supreme Court, 1827

Ex parte Benson

Ex parte Benson
New York Supreme Court · Decided February 15, 1827
6 Cow. 592

Counsel

J. Foote, for the motion.

Ex parte Benson

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We think the C. P. were right. The parties were not before them for any purpose except the motion ; and they were not bound, even if they had jurisdiction, to award the regular and ordinary costs of the cause. These follow, only where the suit comes into court. Here it never was there. There was a want of jurisdiction as to the cause itself; and when we say the C. P. has jurisdiction of the parties for the purpose of awarding costs, we mean the costs of the motion; the maU ter alone upon which the court can act.

Motion denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.