New York Supreme Court, 1827

Bank of Utica v. Kibby

Bank of Utica v. Kibby
New York Supreme Court · Decided May 15, 1827
7 Cow. 148

Counsel

L. Ford, for the defendant,, P. De Witt, contra,, Ford , Dc T'17?tt~

Bank of Utica v. Kibby

Opinion of the Court

Curia.

Shoeing an original order. is necessary, only, where it.is intended to bring a..party into, contempt.for disobeying it. Howland v. Ralph, 3 John. 20. In other cases a copy is sufficient. Cheetham v. Lewis, 2 John. 104. The motion: to set aside the inquest must be granted with, costs..

Motion granted;

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.